- New York State
- BRONX COUNTY
- NYC GEOG DIST # 9 - BRONX
- JHS 22 JORDAN L MOTT
JHS 22 JORDAN L MOTT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA
The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.
Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.
The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.
Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules
- Filter this data
2013
2014
ALL STUDENTS
PROFICIENT
35
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 610
LEVEL 1
407
67%
LEVEL 2
168
28%
LEVEL 3
33
5%
LEVEL 4
2
0%
ALL STUDENTS
PROFICIENT
31
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 503
LEVEL 1
320
64%
LEVEL 2
152
30%
LEVEL 3
28
6%
LEVEL 4
3
1%
BY GENDER
FEMALE
PROFICIENT
19
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 293
LEVEL 1
178
61%
LEVEL 2
96
33%
LEVEL 3
17
6%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
FEMALE
PROFICIENT
20
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 253
LEVEL 1
151
60%
LEVEL 2
82
32%
LEVEL 3
18
7%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
MALE
PROFICIENT
16
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 317
LEVEL 1
229
72%
LEVEL 2
72
23%
LEVEL 3
16
5%
LEVEL 4
0%
MALE
PROFICIENT
11
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 250
LEVEL 1
169
68%
LEVEL 2
70
28%
LEVEL 4
1
0%
BY ETHNICITY
MULTIRACIAL
PROFICIENT
TOTAL TESTED: 0
LEVEL 1
0%
LEVEL 2
0%
LEVEL 3
0%
LEVEL 4
0%
MULTIRACIAL
PROFICIENT
TOTAL TESTED: 0
LEVEL 1
0%
LEVEL 2
0%
LEVEL 3
0%
LEVEL 4
0%
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
PROFICIENT
2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
4
44%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
0%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
PROFICIENT
0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
5
63%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
0%
LEVEL 4
0%
WHITE
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
WHITE
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
PROFICIENT
9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
105
65%
LEVEL 2
47
29%
LEVEL 3
9
6%
LEVEL 4
0%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
PROFICIENT
13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
74
56%
LEVEL 2
46
35%
LEVEL 3
12
9%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
PROFICIENT
23
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 434
LEVEL 1
296
68%
LEVEL 2
115
26%
LEVEL 3
21
5%
LEVEL 4
2
0%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
PROFICIENT
18
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 354
LEVEL 1
237
67%
LEVEL 2
99
28%
LEVEL 3
16
5%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
OTHER GROUPS
GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS
PROFICIENT
35
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 508
LEVEL 1
321
63%
LEVEL 2
152
30%
LEVEL 3
33
6%
LEVEL 4
2
0%
GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS
PROFICIENT
31
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 408
LEVEL 1
241
59%
LEVEL 2
136
33%
LEVEL 3
28
7%
LEVEL 4
3
1%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
PROFICIENT
0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
86
84%
LEVEL 2
16
16%
LEVEL 3
0%
LEVEL 4
0%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
PROFICIENT
0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
79
83%
LEVEL 2
16
17%
LEVEL 3
0%
LEVEL 4
0%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER
PROFICIENT
35
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 420
LEVEL 1
237
56%
LEVEL 2
148
35%
LEVEL 3
33
8%
LEVEL 4
2
0%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER
PROFICIENT
30
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 333
LEVEL 1
167
50%
LEVEL 2
136
41%
LEVEL 3
27
8%
LEVEL 4
3
1%
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER
PROFICIENT
0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 190
LEVEL 1
170
89%
LEVEL 2
20
11%
LEVEL 3
0%
LEVEL 4
0%
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER
PROFICIENT
1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 170
LEVEL 1
153
90%
LEVEL 2
16
9%
LEVEL 3
1
1%
LEVEL 4
0%
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
PROFICIENT
0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
15
75%
LEVEL 2
5
25%
LEVEL 3
0%
LEVEL 4
0%
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
PROFICIENT
4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
21
57%
LEVEL 2
12
32%
LEVEL 3
4
11%
LEVEL 4
0%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
PROFICIENT
35
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 590
LEVEL 1
392
66%
LEVEL 2
163
28%
LEVEL 3
33
6%
LEVEL 4
2
0%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
PROFICIENT
27
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 466
LEVEL 1
299
64%
LEVEL 2
140
30%
LEVEL 3
24
5%
LEVEL 4
3
1%
NOT MIGRANT
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
NOT MIGRANT
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
MIGRANT
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
MIGRANT
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
-
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
- Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
- Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
-
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
